Attention Twitter users. Here’s a new must-follow account: @femscriptintros.
Helmed through producer Ross Putman, @femscriptintros reveals this wretched ways actual Hollywood screenplays introduce actual (or maybe “actual”) female character types. In each case, the name of explained female character has become changed to “Jane” to defend the identities on the screenwriters and their work. Normally, these passages are unrevised. And they completely suuuuuck.
Here is a selecting of some of the most detrimental offenders shared simply by @femscriptintros so far:
Raw Sexual Force is my favorite Shannon Tweed Cinemax flick. Next!
Won’to someone help these kinds of poor, beautiful women of all ages come out of their backside? The world is being rejected their hotness! Their wonderful physical beauty really should be allowed to coexist making use of their professional careers!
Lithe and leggy. With a combo like that, no wonder she’ohydrates not afraid to speak your ex mind.
Okay, as long as its a sexy outline. I hate silhouettes that aren’to sexy. They’re our #1 turnoff.
Okay, however is it a sexy paramedic’s consistent? Or a boring usual paramedic’s uniform?
Gotta hook those viewers early! And what’azines a better hook than a woman who’s adorable and sexy? (For your record, this is exactly how I describe myself to individuals, right down to the aspect where I’m 23.)
For sake of assessment, I would love to discover how commensurate male characters were introduced in these film scripts. Was as much manufactured from their sexiness, in addition to their attempts to disguise which sexiness so they can compliment normal society while nurses or microscope technicians? Or were they allowed to be man beings with things like feelings and identities beyond their physical appears? I wonder. (No, My partner and i don’t. I know the result.) Anyway, this is a good and eye-opening Twitter bank account. Follow it.